SynthesisClinical pharmacokinetics2024
Pharmacokinetics of Antiretroviral Drugs in Older People Living with HIV, Part II: Drugs Licensed Before 2005.
Synthesis in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAdvances in antiretroviral therapy led to an increase in life expectancy among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As aging is characterized by several physiological changes that can influence pharmacokinetics (PK), this systematic review aims to describe the impact of aging on the PK of antiretrovirals (ARV) approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before 2005.
methodsSearches were performed in BVS, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for publications until June 2024. Peer-reviewed published studies were included if they met the following criteria: adults (≥ 18 years) living with HIV; reporting at least one PK parameter or plasma concentration of any ARV approved by the US FDA before 2005 and still used in the clinic: lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), abacavir (ABC), zidovudine (ZDV), efavirenz (EFV), nevirapine (NVP), atazanavir (ATV), lopinavir (LPV), ritonavir (RTV), tipranavir (TPV), and fosamprenavir (FPV); PK parameters stratified per age group as young (aged 18-49 years) or older (age ≥ 50 years) adults; and manuscripts published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish. All studies were evaluated for risk of bias. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration no. CRD42023463092).
resultsAmong 106 studies included, only 22 evaluated the PK of participants aged 50 years or older and only 5 studies compared the PK between young and older adults for ATV, RTV, EFV, and 3TC. Our analysis revealed an increase in minimal concentration (C
conclusionExposure to 3TC, TDF, FTC, ATV, LPV, and RTV increases with age, while exposure to ABC and EFV appears to be unaffected. Despite the large quantity of data on PK in young adults, there is still a gap in knowledge about the effects of aging on the PK of these ARVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39542985What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.