ArticleScientific reports2024
Development and validation of a dynamic nomogram for individualized prediction of survival in patients with colon cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram comprising GLUT1 and clinical characteristics for predicting overall survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current tools for predicting survival outcomes in colon cancer patients predominantly rely on clinical and pathologic characteristics. However, accumulating evidence demonstrates a significant correlation between nutritional status and patient outcomes. This study aimed to establish a new dynamic nomogram for individualized prediction of postoperative overall survival (OS). The clinicopathological and nutritional data of colon cancer patients undergoing radical resection were retrospectively collected and randomly divided into the primary and validation cohorts. Risk factors on OS rates were investigated by Cox analyses and, the nomogram was constructed using significant predictors. Among 1,024 patients, 341 deaths were observed after median follow-up of 54 months. Five independent prognostic factors, including nutritional status assessments, were incorporated into the nomogram. The C-index regarding 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.830, 0.859, and 0.757 in the primary cohort and 0.843, 0.870, and 0.773 in the validation cohort, respectively. Calibration curves for the probability of OS exhibited an optimal agreement. Decision curve analyses revealed the greater application value of the nomogram than the TNM staging system. Based on the nomogram, patients could be stratified into three scenarios with significant prognostic classification (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, we developed and validated an easy-to-use dynamic nomogram for predicting postoperative OS in colon cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.