ReviewThe Journal of antibiotics2025
Discovery of new AMR drugs targeting modulators of antimicrobial activity using in vivo silkworm screening systems.
Review in The Journal of antibiotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leaf mold extract agar facilitates recovery of soil bacterial diversity beyond Bacillus dominance.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Streptococcus pneumoniae upregulates Toll2, Toll9, and defensin genes in Bombyx larvae infection model.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Role of the Hfq Protein in Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics: A Narrative Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial and ADME properties of methoxylated, methylated and nitrated 2-hydroxynaphthalene-1 carboxanilides.ADMET & DMPK · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global concerns about drug-resistant bacteria have underscored the need for new antimicrobial drugs. Emerging strategies in drug discovery include considering the third factors that influence drug activity. These factors include host-derived elements, adjuvants, and drug combinations, which are crucial in regulating antimicrobial efficacy. Traditional in vivo assessments have relied on animal models to study drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET). Alternative models, such as silkworms, are being explored to overcome the ethical and financial barriers associated with mammalian models. The silkworm has been proven effective in evaluating ADMET and in highlighting the therapeutic potential enhanced by third factors. Host factors (either mammalian or non-mammalian) enhance the antimicrobial activity of antimicrobial agents such as lysocin E. Additionally, using D-cycloserine to potentiate vancomycin has successfully combated vancomycin-resistant infections in silkworms. Leveraging silkworms in drug discovery could establish a novel screening method incorporating interactions with third factors, whether host related or non-host-related, thus promising new pathways for identifying antimicrobial drugs with unique mechanisms of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.