Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39543963›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food2024

Does DNA extraction affect the specificity of a PCR method claiming the specific detectability of a genome-edited plant?

Sophia Edelmann, Christian Savini, Dominik Moor, Jörn Lämke, Kathrin Lieske, Marco Mazzara, Hendrik Emons, Joachim Mankertz, Christopher Weidner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sophia EdelmannDepartment Method Standardisation, Reference Laboratories, Resistance to Antibiotics, Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9094-8898
Christian SaviniEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4279-3761
Dominik MoorRisk Assessment Division, Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO), Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1840-556X
Jörn LämkeDepartment Method Standardisation, Reference Laboratories, Resistance to Antibiotics, Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1504-4519
Kathrin LieskeDepartment Method Standardisation, Reference Laboratories, Resistance to Antibiotics, Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1391-4069
Marco MazzaraEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Hendrik EmonsEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-9810
Joachim MankertzDepartment Method Standardisation, Reference Laboratories, Resistance to Antibiotics, Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin, Germany.
Christopher WeidnerDepartment Method Standardisation, Reference Laboratories, Resistance to Antibiotics, Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8752-7635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under current EU legislation, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and derived food and feed products must be authorized as GM food, feed, or seed and appropriate detection methods must be made available for use in official controls. A Real-Time PCR method has recently been published by Chhalliyil et al. claiming to be specific for the detection and identification of genome-edited oilseed rape (OSR) lines commercialized in North America. In a previous study, we have independently assessed this method in three reference laboratories for sensitivity, specificity, and robustness. We found that the method does not meet all the minimum performance requirements (MPR) for GMO testing in the EU, which contradicts the claims of the method developer. Here we show, in addition to the previously published method assessment study that a modified DNA extraction is not the reason for the contradictory findings and does not affect the specificity of the method. We also discuss the procedures recently proposed by the method developers for interpreting PCR results with high Cq values.

Indexed as

DNA, PlantGene EditingGenome, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedPolymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, PlantDNA extractiongenome editingGMO detectionofficial controloilseed rape (OSR)

Identifiers

PMID39543963
PMCPMC11572162

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.