ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
State of the art of real-life concentration monitoring of rifampicin and its implementation contextualized in resource-limited settings: the Tanzanian case.
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards Model-Informed Precision Dosing of High-Dose Rifampicin: A Parsimonious Population Pharmacokinetic Model Capturing Saturation and Autoinduction in Tanzanian and South African Patients with Tuberculosis.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Rifampicin Exposures and Clinical Outcomes: An Exploratory Analysis for the Determination of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Efficacy Targets.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Optimizing imatinib sampling strategies through a population approach: a crucial step to model-informed precision dosing validation for point-of-care therapeutic drug monitoring.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Nutritional Deficiencies and Management in Tuberculosis: Pharmacotherapeutic and Clinical Implications.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unique medical and socio-economic situation in each country affected by TB creates different epidemiological contexts, thus providing exploitable loopholes for the spread of the disease. Country-specific factors such as comorbidities, health insurance, social stigma or the rigidity of the health system complicate the management of TB and the overall outcome of each patient. First-line TB drugs are administered in a standardized manner, regardless of patient characteristics other than weight. This approach does not consider patient-specific conditions such as HIV infection, diabetes mellitus and malnutrition, which can affect the pharmacokinetics of TB drugs, their overall exposure and response to treatment. Therefore, the 'one-size-fits-all' approach is suboptimal for dealing with the underlying inter-subject variability in the pharmacokinetics of anti-TB drugs, further complicated by the recent increased dosing regimen of rifampicin strategies, calling for a patient-specific methodology. In this context, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which allows personalized drug dosing based on blood drug concentrations, may be a legitimate solution to address treatment failure. This review focuses on rifampicin, a critical anti-TB drug, and examines its suitability for TDM and the socio-economic factors that may influence the implementation of TDM in clinical practice in resource-limited settings, illustrated by Tanzania, thereby contributing to the advancement of personalized TB treatment.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.