ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2024
Clinical value of rehabilitation nursing after internal fixation of distal radius fractures.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical value of rehabilitation nursing following internal fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs).
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 114 patients who underwent internal fixation for DRFs between July 2019 and May 2023. Among them, 54 patients received routine nursing care (control group) and 60 patients received rehabilitation nursing (observation group). Comparative analyses were conducted on postoperative pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), swelling, rehabilitation indicators (healing time, time to regain limb mobility, and hospital stays), wrist joint functional recovery (grip strength, Gartland-Werley Scale, rate of excellent and good reduction), quality of life (Short-Form 36 [SF-36]), adverse emotions (Self-Rating Depression Scale [SDS] and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale [SAS]), and nursing satisfaction.
resultsThe observation group exhibited a significant stepwise decrease in VAS and swelling scores on postoperative days 3 and 7 compared to preoperative levels (all P<0.05), and these scores were lower than those of the control group (all P<0.05). The observation group also showed significantly shorter healing time, faster recovery of limb mobility, and reduced hospital stays (all P<0.05). Additionally, patients in the observation group demonstrated higher grip strength, a greater rate of excellent and good reduction, and significantly lower Gartland-Werley, SDS, and SAS scores compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Higher SF-36 scores and greater nursing satisfaction were also observed in the observation group (both P<0.05).
conclusionsRehabilitation nursing after internal fixation of DRFs has significant clinical value, evidenced by substantial relief of postoperative pain and swelling, reduction in adverse emotions, enhanced rehabilitation, improved wrist joint function, and higher quality of life and nursing satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.