ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Case report: a case of masked subclavian artery stenosis in a haemodialysis patient.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subclavian artery stenosis in hemodialysis patients: a case series and review of the literature.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subclavian artery stenosis is generally screened by a left-right brachial systolic blood pressure difference. However, subclavian artery stenoses are often underdiagnosed due to marginally identified symptoms. In dialysis patients, a relative or absolute contradiction of measuring blood pressure in shunt brachial artery may further limit the disease screening. Case summary: A 77-year-old female requiring dialysis presented with a suspected acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock. Five months before presentation, the patient was increasingly given inotropic drugs and had often chest discomfort during dialysis. An emergency coronary angiogram of the right coronary artery revealed 99% stenosis with hypoplasia. During catheterization, angiography of the aortic arch showed subtotal occlusion of the left subclavian artery. After revascularization, patients did not suffer from low blood pressure during haemodialysis. Discussion: Dialysis patients may have high perceived risk of subclavian artery stenosis. However, limitation of measuring blood pressure in shunt artery may enhance its underdiagnosis. Our case highlights the importance of screening for subclavian artery stenosis in patients undergoing dialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.