ArticlePloS one2024
Virtual dentistry strategy to enhance knowledge, attitudes, and practices in selecting sweetened ultra-processed foods.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Education on the selection of low-sugar ultra-processed foods (UPF) plays a crucial role in promoting good oral health. This study aimed to assess the impact of a virtual educational strategy, developed in the field of dentistry, on improve Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAPs) related to oral health and the appropriate selection of sweet-tasting UPF. A quasi-experimental study with a pre-test and post-test design was conducted, involving parents and caregivers of children and pre-adolescents. Thirteen virtual learning objects (VLO) were delivered via Facebook. To measure the impact of the strategy, a validated instrument was used before the intervention, immediately after, and again six months later to assess Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAPs) on the subject. The median scores before and after the intervention were compared using the Friedman test for related samples, followed by multiple comparisons with Dunn's test. Participants' KAP levels were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square test and multiple comparisons of column proportions with Bonferroni correction. Finally, a satisfaction and applicability survey was conducted. A significant improvement (p < 0.01) was observed in the participants' median KAP scores both immediately after the intervention and six months later. A greater number of participants reached the highest level in knowledge (Before (B): 43.8%, Immediately After (IA): 86%, After six months (A6): 81.3%), attitudes (B: 34.2%, IA: 69.4%, A6: 65.2%), and practices (B: 22.5%, IA: 53.7%, A6: 47.3%). Most participants described the course as consistently dynamic, well-organized, and appropriate timing. They also expressed their intention to apply the knowledge in their daily lives. The implemented strategy improved participants' KAPs concerning oral health and the appropriate selection of sweet-tasting UPF. It also resulted in participants' children consuming fewer sweet bakery products, candies, and flavored milk. Additionally, more participants reported consistently reading food labels after the intervention, although this behavior was not adopted by the majority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.