Evidence mapPaperPMID 39546793Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

EDAI Framework for Integrating Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Throughout the Lifecycle of AI to Improve Health and Oral Health Care: Qualitative Study.

Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, Richa Shrivastava, Anita Brown-Johnson, Pascale Caidor, Claire Davies, Amal Idrissi Janati, Pascaline Kengne Talla, Sreenath Madathil, Bettina M Willie, Elham Emami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi *Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-1360
Richa Shrivastava *Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-4147
Anita Brown-JohnsonDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-7219-4417
Pascale CaidorDepartment of Communication, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6003-5596
Claire DaviesDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4880-2654
Amal Idrissi JanatiFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0099-1284
Pascaline Kengne TallaFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1038-0329
Sreenath MadathilFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-6518
Bettina M WillieFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2907-3580
Elham Emami *Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7730-4139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have identified significant gaps in equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) considerations within the lifecycle of artificial intelligence (AI), spanning from data collection and problem definition to implementation stages. Despite the recognized need for integrating EDI principles, there is currently no existing guideline or framework to support this integration in the AI lifecycle.

objectiveThis study aimed to address this gap by identifying EDI principles and indicators to be integrated into the AI lifecycle. The goal was to develop a comprehensive guiding framework to guide the development and implementation of future AI systems.

methodsThis study was conducted in 3 phases. In phase 1, a comprehensive systematic scoping review explored how EDI principles have been integrated into AI in health and oral health care settings. In phase 2, a multidisciplinary team was established, and two 2-day, in-person international workshops with over 60 representatives from diverse backgrounds, expertise, and communities were conducted. The workshops included plenary presentations, round table discussions, and focused group discussions. In phase 3, based on the workshops' insights, the EDAI framework was developed and refined through iterative feedback from participants. The results of the initial systematic scoping review have been published separately, and this paper focuses on subsequent phases of the project, which is related to framework development.

resultsIn this study, we developed the EDAI framework, a comprehensive guideline that integrates EDI principles and indicators throughout the entire AI lifecycle. This framework addresses existing gaps at various stages, from data collection to implementation, and focuses on individual, organizational, and systemic levels. Additionally, we identified both the facilitators and barriers to integrating EDI within the AI lifecycle in health and oral health care.

conclusionsThe developed EDAI framework provides a comprehensive, actionable guideline for integrating EDI principles into AI development and deployment. By facilitating the systematic incorporation of these principles, the framework supports the creation and implementation of AI systems that are not only technologically advanced but also sensitive to EDI principles.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOral HealthCultural DiversityDiversity, Equity, InclusionHealth EquityHumansQualitative ResearchAIartificial intelligenceEDIequity, diversity, and inclusionhealth caremachine learningoral health care

Identifiers

PMID39546793
PMCPMC11607576

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.