ArticleMedical image analysis2025
Enhancing chest X-ray datasets with privacy-preserving large language models and multi-type annotations: A data-driven approach for improved classification.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Model Automated Extraction of Clinical Signs and Symptoms From Emergency Department Reports for Machine Learning Prediction Models: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Insufficient reporting quality in large language model studies in the field of radiology.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- From large language models to multimodal AI: a scoping review on the potential of generative AI in medicine.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Bootstrapping BI-RADS classification using large language models and transformers in breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Article
- AXpert: human expert facilitated privacy-preserving large language models for abdominal X-ray report labeling.JAMIA open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In chest X-ray (CXR) image analysis, rule-based systems are usually employed to extract labels from reports for dataset releases. However, there is still room for improvement in label quality. These labelers typically output only presence labels, sometimes with binary uncertainty indicators, which limits their usefulness. Supervised deep learning models have also been developed for report labeling but lack adaptability, similar to rule-based systems. In this work, we present MAPLEZ (Medical report Annotations with Privacy-preserving Large language model using Expeditious Zero shot answers), a novel approach leveraging a locally executable Large Language Model (LLM) to extract and enhance findings labels on CXR reports. MAPLEZ extracts not only binary labels indicating the presence or absence of a finding but also the location, severity, and radiologists' uncertainty about the finding. Over eight abnormalities from five test sets, we show that our method can extract these annotations with an increase of 3.6 percentage points (pp) in macro F1 score for categorical presence annotations and more than 20 pp increase in F1 score for the location annotations over competing labelers. Additionally, using the combination of improved annotations and multi-type annotations in classification supervision in a dataset of limited-resolution CXRs, we demonstrate substantial advancements in proof-of-concept classification quality, with an increase of 1.1 pp in AUROC over models trained with annotations from the best alternative approach. We share code and annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.