Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39548346›Full record

ReviewNature microbiology2024

Estimates of microbiome heritability across hosts.

Andrew H Morris, Brendan J M Bohannan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The island biology of the host microbiome.Trends in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative genetics of microbiome-mediated traits.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Microbiome evolution plays a secondary role in host rapid adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew H MorrisInstitute of Ecology & Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. andrewmorris@mailbox.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3678-4498
Brendan J M BohannanInstitute of Ecology & Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-1016

Funding

Live Imaging CoreP01GM125576 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GUILLEMIN, KAREN J · 2018 to 2022
$7.8M
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation) 10001NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM125576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiomes contribute to variation in many plant and animal traits, suggesting that microbiome-mediated traits could evolve through selection on the host. However, for such evolution to occur, microbiomes must exhibit sufficient heritability to contribute to host adaptation. Previous work has attempted to estimate the heritability of a variety of microbiome attributes. Here we show that most published estimates are limited to vertebrate and plant hosts, but significant heritability of microbiome attributes has been frequently reported. This indicates that microbiomes could evolve in response to host-level selection, but studies across a wider range of hosts are necessary before general conclusions can be made. We suggest future studies focus on standardizing heritability measurements for the purpose of meta-analyses and investigate the role of the environment in contributing to heritable microbiome variation. This could have important implications for the use of microbiomes in conservation, agriculture and medicine.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPlantsAnimalsBiological EvolutionHost Microbial InteractionsHumansSelection, GeneticVertebrates

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.