ArticleRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)2024
Manipulating levels of uncertainty in a decision-making task for obsessive compulsive disorder.
Article in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe investigated whether manipulating levels of uncertainty would influence performance in a decision-making task in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
methodsThis case-control study compares Beads Task (measuring reflection/decisional impulsivity) performance and trait impulsivity (Short Urgency-Premeditation-Perseverance-Sensation Seeking-Positive Urgency [UPPS-P] Impulsive Behavior Scale) in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (n = 65) and non-clinical controls (n = 45). Differences between groups were assessed with the Mann Whitney U test.
resultsThe obsessive-compulsive disorder group had significantly fewer draws to decision (U = 1,845, p = 0.019) and less subjective decision-certainty (U = 1,518, p = 0.00) in the low uncertainty (85:15) condition, and higher negative urgency scores (U = 2,163, p ≤ 0.001) and lower sensation-seeking scores (U = 907.5, p = 0.001) in UPPS-P. However, differences in Beads Task performance did not survive correction for multiple comparisons.
conclusionPatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder engage in more impulsive decision-making in the lower uncertainty condition than healthy controls, despite low subjective certainty of the decision. They also had higher scores for the trait impulsivity factor of negative urgency. Future studies should explore the contribution of trait impulsivity, as well as symptom severity, anxiety, and decision-certainty, to impulsivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.