Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39550365›Full record

SynthesisNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2024

Web-based pulmonary telehabilitation: a systematic review.

Manuel Ayala-Chauvin, Fernando A Chicaiza, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, Janio Jadan, Verónica Maldonado-Garcés, Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Gloria Acosta-Vargas, Mayra Carrión-Toro, Marco Santórum, Mario Gonzalez-Rodriguez and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Manuel Ayala-Chauvin *Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Humanas y de la Educación-CICHE, Facultad de Ingenierías, Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador. mayala5@indoamerica.edu.ec.
Fernando A Chicaiza *Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Humanas y de la Educación-CICHE, Facultad de Ingenierías, Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador. fachicaiza@indoamerica.edu.ec.
Patricia Acosta-Vargas *Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador. patricia.acosta@udla.edu.ec.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-0117
Janio JadanCentro de Investigación en Mecatrónica y Sistemas Interactivos-MIST, Facultad de Ingenierías, Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador.
Verónica Maldonado-GarcésFacultad de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Esteban Ortiz-PradoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Gloria Acosta-VargasFacultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Mayra Carrión-ToroFacultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Marco SantórumFacultad de Ingeniería de Sistemas, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Mario Gonzalez-RodriguezFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Camila MaderaFacultad de Enfermería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Wilmer EsparzaFacultad de Enfermería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (WBPTR) can serve as a valuable tool when access to conventional care is limited. This review assesses a series of studies that explore pulmonary telerehabilitation programmes delivered via web-based platforms. The studies involved participants with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Of the 3190 participants, 1697 engaged in WBPTR platforms, while the remaining 1493 comprised the control groups. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation led to an increase in daily step count (MD 446.66, 95% CI 96.47 to 796.86), though this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Additionally, WBPTR did not yield significant improvements in the six-minute walking test (MD 5.01, 95% CI - 5.19 to 15.21), health-related quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 2.24 to 1.95), or the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD 0.17, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.46). Moreover, there was no significant improvement in dyspnoea-related health status, as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.27) or the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.14). Based on these findings, this review concludes that WBPTR does not offer substantial advantages over traditional care. While slight improvements in exercise performance were observed, no meaningful enhancements were noted in dyspnoea or quality of life metrics. Overall, WBPTR remains a complementary and accessible option for managing and monitoring COPD patients. However, further research and innovation are required to improve its efficacy and adapt it to various clinical environments.

Indexed as

InternetPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTelerehabilitationHumansQuality of LifeTelemedicineWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID39550365
PMCPMC11569176

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.