Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39550536›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Analysis of cutaneous leishmaniasis among military personnel in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a spatiotemporal study between 2018 and 2022, trend forecasting based on ARIMA model.

Reza Tadayonfar, Arasb Dabbagh-Moghaddam, Mohammad Barati, Mohammad Hassan Kazemi-Galougahi, Zahra Aminifarsani, Nahid Jalallou, Mohammad Reza Shirzadi, Faranak Ghrachorloo, Ramin Khaghani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Reza TadayonfarInfectious Diseases Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arasb Dabbagh-MoghaddamInfectious Diseases Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. dr.arasb@ajaums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-1762
Mohammad BaratiInfectious Diseases Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mbaratim@gmail.com.
Mohammad Hassan Kazemi-GalougahiDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra AminifarsaniBayesian Imaging and Spatial Statistics Group, Institute for Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nahid JalallouDepartment of Laboratory Science, School of Paramedicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Reza ShirzadiCenter for Communicable Diseases Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Faranak GhrachorlooCenter for Communicable Diseases Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Ramin KhaghaniDepartment of Military Health, Faculty of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutaneous leishmaniasis is one of the few infectious diseases whose global prevalence is on the rise. Iran ranks among the eight most affected countries in the world. Iranian military personnel are often sent to endemic areas for cutaneous leishmaniasis without prior immunity, and they have fewer health facilities in military centers than the general population. This study aims to comprehensively investigate the situation of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iranian military personnel across all units from 2018 to 2022 and predict the disease trend using time series analysis up to the end of 2025.

methodsWe analyzed data from the Iranian Ministry of Health to perform spatiotemporal and descriptive analyses based on patient frequency. Variables examined included age distribution, cutaneous leishmaniasis types (zoonotic or anthroponotic), month of healthcare facility visits, and lesion locations. This study employed the ARIMA model (p = 2, d = 0, q = 1)(P = 3, D = 0, Q = 0), for time series analysis and forecasting the disease trend up to 36 months after 2022.

resultsOver five years, 2,894 patients were reported. The Esfahan, Khuzestan, and Ilam provinces had the highest average patient counts, with hot spots primarily found in central, south, southwestern, and western Iran. Although the total number of patients with zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis was almost equal to anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis, in high-risk provinces such as Esfahan, Khuzestan, and Ilam, the confirmed cases of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis were much more than anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis. patient numbers peak in October and November. Demographic analysis revealed that younger patients outnumbered older patients. Lesion locations were frequent on the forelimbs and lower limbs. The time series analysis for 36 months after 2022 indicated the seasonal pattern of the disease and predicted an upward trend after 2022.

conclusionWhile overall cases have declined, provinces such as Esfahan exhibit an upward trend. The expansion of hotspots from the west and southwestern to the center and south of Iran, coupled with an increasing trend in time series analysis, suggests the potential emergence of new foci and a rise in patient numbers in the future. In provinces with high disease prevalence, preventive measures should be prioritized, particularly in Ilam, Khuzestan, and Esfahan.

Indexed as

ForecastingLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMilitary PersonnelSpatio-Temporal AnalysisAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceYoung AdultARIMACutaneous leishmaniasisIranMilitary personnelSpatio-temporal analysis

Identifiers

PMID39550536
PMCPMC11569613

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.