ArticleBMC cancer2024
Exploring the impact of mitochondrial-targeting anthelmintic agents with GLUT1 inhibitor BAY-876 on breast cancer cell metabolism.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic reprogramming in cancer: dysregulation of glucose, lipid, and amino acid pathways and therapeutic opportunities.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Targeting Glycolytic Metabolism in Cancer Therapy: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives.Cells · 2026Review
- The regulatory roles and therapeutic strategies of the solute carrier transporters in cancer metabolism.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- NDR2 Kinase Regulates Microglial Metabolic Adaptation and Inflammatory Response: Critical Role in Glucose-Dependent Functional Plasticity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The Landscape of Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target.Pathology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer cells alter their metabolic phenotypes with nutritional change. Single agent approaches targeting mitochondrial metabolism in cancer have failed due to either dose limiting off target toxicities, or lack of significant efficacy in vivo. To mitigate these clinical challenges, we investigated the potential utility of repurposing FDA approved mitochondrial targeting anthelmintic agents, niclosamide, IMD-0354 and pyrvinium pamoate, to be combined with GLUT1 inhibitor BAY-876 to enhance the inhibitory capacity of the major metabolic phenotypes exhibited by tumors.
methodsTo test this, we used breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 which exhibit differing basal metabolic rates of glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration, respectively. Metabolic characterization was carried out using Seahorse XFe96 Bioanalyzer and statistical analysis was carried out via ANOVA.
resultsHere, we found that specific responses to mitochondrial and glycolysis targeting agents elicit responses that correlate with tested cell lines basal metabolic rates and fuel preference, highlighting the potential to cater metabolism targeting treatment regimens based on specific tumor nutrient handling. Inhibition of GLUT1 with BAY-876 potently inhibited glycolysis in both MDA-MB-231 and 4T1 cells, and niclosamide and pyrvinium pamoate perturbed mitochondrial respiration that resulted in potent compensatory glycolysis in the cell lines tested.
conclusionIn this regard, combination of BAY-876 with both mitochondrial targeting agents resulted in inhibition of compensatory glycolysis and subsequent metabolic crisis. These studies highlight targeting tumor metabolism as a combination treatment regimen that can be tailored by basal and compensatory metabolic phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.