Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551749›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Assessing population genetic structure and diversity and their driving factors in Phoebe zhennan populations.

Jian Peng, Jiaxin Xie, Yunjie Gu, Hongying Guo, Shuaiying Zhang, Xin Huang, Xiandan Luo, Jianghong Qian, Minhao Liu, Xueqin Wan and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jian Peng *Sichuan Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Conservation for Forest and Wetland, Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu, China.
Jiaxin Xie *Forestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yunjie GuSichuan Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Conservation for Forest and Wetland, Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu, China. guyunjie7901@163.com.
Hongying GuoSichuan Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Conservation for Forest and Wetland, Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu, China.
Shuaiying ZhangForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xin HuangForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xiandan LuoForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Jianghong QianForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Minhao LiuSichuan Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Conservation for Forest and Wetland, Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Chengdu, China.
Xueqin WanForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Lianghua ChenForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xiong HuangForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Fan ZhangCollege of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Fang HeForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Peng ZhuForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yu ZhongForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Hanbo YangForestry Ecological Engineering in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecological Safety on the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. yanghanbo6@sicau.edu.cn.

Funding

Ecosystem Improvement in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Basin Program 510201202038467Key Research and Development Project of Sichuan Province 2021YFYZ0032National Science Foundation of Sichuan Province 2022NSFSC1062Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Sichuan Forestry and Grassland 2023LCTD0203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhoebe zhennan, commonly known as "golden-thread nanmu," is one of the most valuable and protected tree species in China. An accurate understanding of the population genetic structure and its environmental factors is of significance for the protection and selection of new P. zhennan varieties.

resultsSixteen nSSR and six cpSSR markers were used to determine the genetic diversity and population structure of P. zhennan and the effect of environmental factors on the genetic structure. The nSSR markers identified a total of 451 number of alleles (Na), while cpSSR markers detected 20 Na. A relative high level of genetic diversity was observed in the P. zhennan population evidenced by high Shannon's information index (I) of 0.671 and 2.294 based on cpSSR and nSSR datasets. The low value of fixation index (F) observed from the nSSR dataset indicated low breeding within the population. The genetic differentiation was mainly detected within populations (only 28% and 13% of the variance being between populations according to the nSSR and cpSSR datasets). Among them, the HNSZX (H = 0.469) and SCSZZ (I = 1.943) populations exhibited the highest level of genetic diversity, while the HNXXT (H = 0.041) and SCLJS (I = 0.943) populations exhibited the lowest level of genetic diversity. The average genetic differentiation coefficient (Fst) and gene flow (Nm) were 0.022-0.128 and 1.698-11.373, respectively, which indicated a moderate level of genetic differentiation and a high level of gene flow. STRUCTURE, neighbor-joining clustering, and principal coordinate analysis divided 543 individuals into two or three categories based on the nSSR or cpSSR datasets. Four temperature, three precipitation, five chemical, five physical, and one soil texture variable showed significant effects on the genetic structure and distribution of P. zhennan populations. Compared to nSSR, the genetic differentiation among populations based on cpSSR datasets conformed to the geographic isolation model, suggesting that geographic and genetic distances should be considered for further genetic conservation and breeding utilization. The importance of in situ conservation units, such as populations with a high level of genetic diversity, more private alleles, and haplotypes (e.g., population SCGTS, SCYFS, and YNYJX), should be emphasized. Additionally, breeding, along with artificially assisted population regeneration and restoration, should also be carefully planned, taking into account climate and soil properties at the same time.

conclusionsIn conclusion, this study provided genetic background information for the genetic conservation, management, and utilization of P. zhennan.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenetic VariationChinaGene FlowGenetic MarkersMicrosatellite RepeatsGenetic MarkerscpSSRGenetic conservationGenetic diversitynSSRPhoebe zhennanPopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID39551749
PMCPMC11572363

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.