Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552111›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

Megan DelDot, Esther Lau, Nicole Rayner, Jean Spinks, Fiona Kelly, Lisa Nissen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan DelDotSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-7028-8059
Esther LauSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1892-9996
Nicole RaynerLibrary, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0261-6821
Jean SpinksCentre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8128-8872
Fiona KellySchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7360-4655
Lisa NissenSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5826-4605

Funding

Megan DelDot is a PhD student and is supported by a Commonwealth Government of Australia Research Training Program Scholarship, a Medical Research Future Fund grant (MRFQ1000023) and the Alan Grant-Taylor Memorial Scholarship.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedication-related problems remain a significant burden despite the availability of various interventions and services in primary care. Involving health care consumers to design interventions or services across health disciplines is becoming more widely used as this type of engagement reportedly leads to more accessible, acceptable and sustainable health services and quality of life. We conducted a scoping review to examine when and how consumers have been involved in the design and development of medication safety interventions or services within the primary care.

methodsWe searched five key databases (MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Embase (Elsevier) and Cochrane Library (Wiley)) for relevant articles published up to February 2024. Studies were included if they involved adult consumers (≥ 18 years), their families, carers or the wider community as stakeholders. This review only included studies where the aim was to improve safe and effective medication use, delivered exclusively in primary care. To examine consumer involvement approaches and methods we adapted a framework describing the stages of consumer involvement for the data extraction tool.

resultsOverall, 15 studies were included (comprising 24 articles). Codesign, experience-based codesign, coproduction and participatory action research were commonly used approaches. Meetings, interviews, surveys/questionnaires were commonly used methods. Two studies reported consumer involvement across all stages of the research study, and only one study described the consumer experience of being involved in the research process. The impact of consumer involvement on the effectiveness of these services or interventions was mixed.

conclusionThe potential benefits of consumer involvement in the design and development of medication safety interventions or services may not have been fully maximised, given that genuine consumer involvement across all stages of the research study appears uncommon. More transparent and consistent reporting around the description of consumers involved, their experience of being involved and overall impact and quality of consumer participation is needed. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This scoping review was undertaken without consumers, patients, service users, caregivers or people with lived experience or members of the public due to resource limitations. This scoping review was undertaken and written by academics, who have undertaken codesign with consumers and stakeholders and also have personal lived experience of medication-related problems.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationPrimary Health CareDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansPatient Safetyconsumerconsumer engagementconsumer involvementconsumer participationmedication safetypatient and public involvementprimary care

Identifiers

PMID39552111
PMCPMC11570683

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.