ArticleBrain and behavior2024
Evaluation of Carotid Stenosis in a High-Stroke-Risk Population by Hemodynamic Dual-Parameters Based on Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanopriming by vascular stiffness and phenotypic reprogramming by disturbed flow: mechanobiology and clinical translation in atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Vector Flow Imaging for Carotid Artery Stenosis Assessment: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of vector flow imaging-derived wall shear stress and radiofrequency echo-tracking-derived arterial stiffness indices in severe carotid stenosis.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels are associated with intracranial arterial stenosis in elderly patients.BMC neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study explored the feasibility of using high-frame-rate ultrasound vector flow imaging (VFI) to quantitatively assess hemodynamics in atherosclerotic internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) by evaluating dual-parameters, turbulence index (Tur), and wall shear stress (WSS). Their efficacy in evaluating carotid artery stenosis was also analyzed.
methodsFifty-nine patients with ICAS were enrolled. B-mode ultrasound and V Flow (a high-frame-rate VFI) were performed using the Resona R9 system. The stenosis rate was measured in grayscale mode, whereas the time-averaged Tur index, the time-averaged WSS (WSS
resultsCompared to proximal to stenosis (Tur index, 2.88% ± 3.65%), highly disordered blood flow was observed in the stenotic (23.17% ± 15.52%, p < 0.001) and distal segment (25.86% ± 17.29%, p < 0.001). WSS
conclusionThe application of Tur index and WSS for quantitative assessment of ICAS hemodynamic changes is feasible, with the combined evaluation of these two parameters providing incremental diagnostic value for carotid artery stenosis. VFI-based dual quantitative parameters may offer promising noninvasive diagnostic tools for carotid artery stenosis in high-stroke-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.