ArticleCureus2024
A Case of Migraine Treated Through Hybrid Consultation via In-Person and Online Telemedicine at an Occupational Health Nurse's Office.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Considerations for Creating a User-Friendly Telemedicine Service in Japan.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An occupational doctor cannot perform medical procedures, such as diagnosis and prescription. They can only give advice to the workplace. Online telemedicine facilitates workplace-doctor collaboration and may solve this problem. We present the first case of migraine treated by hybrid consultation via in-person and online telemedicine at the occupational health office. In the present case, a 36-year-old male had experienced headaches since age 15 and had been diagnosed with migraine. He was on prophylactic treatment with 10 mg of lomerizine, experiencing one monthly migraine attack, often relieved by 50 mg of sumatriptan. His Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score was 56 at the consultation. He visited the occupational health nurse's office due to a migraine attack. An occupational doctor assessed him and diagnosed a migraine attack. The patient requested triptans, but only over-the-counter acetaminophen was available, and the doctor could not prescribe medication because the doctor was just an occupational doctor, and the nurse's office was not a clinic under the Japanese Medical Act. The occupational doctor, who was also hired by the other clinic as a physician, conducted an online consultation via the clinic at the nurse's office, diagnosed a migraine attack, and prescribed 50 mg of sumatriptan. The prescription was sent to a nearby pharmacy, and the patient found relief within 15 minutes after taking the triptan. Regular online consultation at the nurse's office has been continued, and prophylactic medications were strengthened. His migraine frequency decreased once in five months, and the HIT-6 score improved to 50. Performing online telemedicine at the workplace, such as the occupational nurse's office, could overturn the conventional wisdom that occupational physicians cannot perform medical treatment at non-medical institutions and can only refer patients to other clinics based on the Japanese Medical Act. Our case suggested the importance of strategic collaboration between occupational doctors and telemedicine-enabled medical facilities in ensuring seamless healthcare delivery, particularly for busy workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.