ArticleCureus2024
Population-Level Interest in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss Using Google Trends Statistics in a 12-Month Retrospective Analysis: An Infodemiology and Infoveillance Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of obesity interventions on male fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction update · 2026Pooled it
- Perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight management in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Semaglutide in the Real World: Attitudes of the Population.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Health Beliefs and Obesity Bias as Determinants of Attitudes Toward the Rising Tides of GLP-1 Medications: Mounjaro and Ozempic.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is an exacerbated public health challenge, increasing the risk of several diseases and mortality while deteriorating the quality of life. There is significant dedication to exploring obesity therapies using glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, which have shown efficacy in reducing the number of deaths and complications associated with type 2 diabetes. This research aimed to examine the recent search popularity of GLP-1 agonists using Google Trends at both national (in Iraq) and global levels. To quantify relative search volume (RSV), the total search query activity has been transformed to a percentage scale ranging from 0% to 100%. The word "Ozempic" was chosen because of its extensive coverage in social media and web/print publications pertaining to this subject matter. A comparative search was performed targeting the phrases "Wegovy," "Saxenda," and "Mounjaro" to identify a novel combination GLP-1 agonist from August 2023 to August 2024. The present study demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the RSV among the four drugs (P < 0.0001) nationally and globally. In Iraq, the highest RSV for Ozempic was documented in Duhok, followed by Sulaymaniyah and Erbil. A comparable RSV profile has been noted for Saxenda, while substantial interest in Wegovy is seen in Ninawa. Meanwhile, globally, the highest RSV for Ozempic was recorded in Canada, the United States of America, and Australia. A distinct RSV profile has been observed for Saxenda, with heightened search interest recorded in Latin America, Poland, Sweden, and Australia. By contrast, Mounjaro received search interest primarily in Greenland and the United States, while Mounjaro search interest was noted in Canada, the United States, and Australia. This study demonstrates a significant and growing public interest in GLP-1 agonists, namely, Ozempic, Saxenda, Wegovy, and Mounjaro. As the use of GLP-1 agonists for weight loss becomes more common, more knowledge, understanding, and continuous scientific research will make it more convenient to obtain the best patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.