Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39553313›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Effects of probiotic supplementation on bone health in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fang Wang, Wei Wei, Peng Ju Liu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Probiotic Supplementation and Bone Health Parameters in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Bone Health for Gynaecologists.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fang WangDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China Academic Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China Academic Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Peng Ju LiuDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China Academic Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: The beneficial effects of probiotic supplementation on bone health in postmenopausal women require further validation. Objective: This study systematically reviewed and conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the relationship between probiotic supplementation and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) among postmenopausal women. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across four databases to retrieve data on lumbar spine BMD, hip BMD, collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX), receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), osteocalcin (OC), osteoprotegerin (OPG), N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) in postmenopausal women. Eligible RCTs were quantitatively analyzed using random-effects meta-analyses. Additional analyses, including subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses, were performed. Results: Twelve RCTs involving 1183 postmenopausal women were included. Compared with the control group, postmenopausal women who received probiotic supplementation showed significantly greater BMD in both the lumbar spine (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14 to 1.05) and the hip (SMD = 0.74, 95%CI 0.15 to 1.33). Additionally, probiotic supplementation was associated with reduced levels of CTX (SMD = -1.51, 95%CI -1.88 to -0.41) and BALP (SMD = -1.80, 95%CI -2.78 to -0.81). No significant differences were found between the probiotic and control groups in terms of other BTMs. Subgroup analyses revealed that the increase in BMD due to probiotic supplementation was more significant in postmenopausal women with osteopenia than in those with osteoporosis. The meta-analysis results for both lumbar spine and hip BMD remained robust after conducting sensitivity analyses and meta-regressions. Conclusion: Supplementation with probiotics may increase BMD among postmenopausal women, with stronger evidence in women with osteopenia than osteoporosis. Further RCTs are suggested to confirm and refine these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024576764.

Indexed as

Bone DensityDietary SupplementsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPostmenopauseProbioticsBone RemodelingFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbonebone turnover markerosteopeniaosteoporosispostmenopausal womenprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID39553313
PMCPMC11563942

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.