Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554502›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

A study of machine learning to predict NRDS severity based on lung ultrasound score and clinical indicators.

Chunyan Huang, Xiaoming Ha, Yanfang Cui, Hongxia Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chunyan HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, China.
Xiaoming HaDepartment of Ultrasound, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, China.
Yanfang CuiDepartment of Ultrasound, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, China.
Hongxia ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop predictive models for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) using machine learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of severity predictions. Methods: This double-blind cohort study included 230 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Yantaishan Hospital between December 2020 and June 2023. Of these, 119 neonates were diagnosed with NRDS and placed in the NRDS group, while 111 neonates with other conditions formed the non-NRDS (N-NRDS) group. All neonates underwent lung ultrasound and various clinical assessments, with data collected on the oxygenation index (OI), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), respiratory index (RI), and lung ultrasound score (LUS). An independent sample test was used to compare the groups' LUS, OI, RI, SOFA scores, and clinical data. Use Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to identify predictor variables, and construct a model for predicting NRDS severity using logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (NN), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms. The importance of predictive variables and performance metrics was evaluated for each model. Results: The NRDS group showed significantly higher LUS, SOFA, and RI scores and lower OI values than the N-NRDS group ( Conclusion: Four predictive models based on machine learning can accurately assess the severity of NRDS. Among them, the RF model exhibits the best predictive performance, offering more effective support for the treatment and care of neonates.

Indexed as

clinical indicatormachine learningNRDSprediction modelrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID39554502
PMCPMC11568467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.