ArticleOncology letters2025
Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab or apatinib) plus chemotherapy in patients with platinum‑resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: A retrospective study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of patients with ovarian cancer will relapse and subsequently develop platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRROC). Antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy may be a potential treatment option in patients with PRROC. However, further evidence is required to facilitate clinical application. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab or apatinib) plus chemotherapy in patients with PRROC. Data from 86 patients with PRROC receiving antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab or apatinib) plus chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, weekly-paclitaxel or gemcitabine) were reviewed retrospectively. Data for treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were obtained. Complete response, partial response, stable disease and progressive disease rates were 0.0, 33.7, 44.2 and 22.1%, respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 33.7 and 77.9%, respectively. Median (and 95% confidence intervals) PFS and OS values were 6.5 (4.7-8.2) and 20.3 (14.1-26.5) months, respectively. PFS (P=0.016) and OS (P=0.005) durations were longer in patients that received the antiangiogenic plus chemotherapy regimen as a second-line treatment vs. patients that received it as a third-line or above treatment. Ascites (yes vs. no) and current treatment lines (third or above vs. second) were independently associated with shorter PFS and OS (all P<0.05). The most frequent treatment-induced adverse events were leukopenia (34.9%), hypertension (30.2%) and fatigue (30.2%). All adverse events were considered acceptable and only previously reported adverse events were observed. The findings of the present study may provide further clinical evidence for the application of antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy in patients with PRROC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.