Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554635›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024

Efficacy of multimodal analgesia based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Lingli Xu, Lu Yao, Jianfen Qin, Hongzhen Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lingli XuLingli Xu, Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310016, P.R. China.
Lu YaoLu Yao, Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310016, P.R. China.
Jianfen QinJianfen Qin, Nursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310016, P.R. China.
Hongzhen XuHongzhen Xu Department of Nursing, The Children's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province 310052, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effect of multimodal analgesia based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (LRG) for gastric cancer (GC). Methods: Clinical data of 128 patients undergoing LRG for GC, admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from March 2021 to March 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 66 patients received a multimodal analgesic management based on ERAS (ERAS group), and 62 patients were treated with conventional mode of analgesia (control group). Pain levels, rehabilitation status, as well as inflammatory factors and stress response indicators before and after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( Conclusions: Patients undergoing LRG for GC can benefit from a multimodal pain management plan based on ERAS to reduce postoperative pain, alleviate inflammation, stress responses, and shorten the postoperative recovery process.

Indexed as

Enhanced recovery after surgeryGastric cancerLaparoscopic radical gastrectomyMultimodal analgesia

Identifiers

PMID39554635
PMCPMC11568728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.