ArticleAJPM focus2024
Comprehensive Health Assessment Using Risk Prediction for Multiple Diseases Based on Health Checkup Data.
Article in AJPM focus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tools developed to assess individuals' comprehensive health status would be beneficial for personalized prevention and treatment. This study aimed to develop a set of risk prediction models to estimate the risk for multiple diseases such as heart, blood vessel, brain, metabolic, liver, and kidney diseases using health checkup data only. Methods: This is a retrospective study that used health checkup data combined with diagnostic information from electronic health records of Kurashiki Central Hospital in Okayama, Japan. All exposure factors were measured at the first health checkup visit, including demographic characteristics, laboratory test results, lifestyle questionnaires, medication use, and medical history. Primary outcomes were the diagnoses of 15 diseases during the follow-up period. Cox proportional hazard regression was applied to develop risk prediction models for heart, blood vessel, brain, metabolic, liver, and kidney diseases. Area under the curve with 4-year risk assessments were performed to evaluate the models. Results: From January 2012 to September 2022, a total of 92,174 individuals aged 15-96 years underwent general health checkups. The area under the curve of the models in validation datasets was as follows: atrial fibrillation, 0.81; acute myocardial infarction, 0.81; heart failure, 0.76; cardiomyopathy, 0.72; angina pectoris, 0.70; atherosclerosis, 0.82; hypertension, 0.80; cerebral infarction, 0.77; intracerebral hemorrhage, 0.68; subarachnoid hemorrhage, 0.50; type-2 diabetes mellitus, 0.82; hyperlipidemia, 0.70; alcoholic liver disease, 0.91; liver fibrosis, 0.92; and chronic kidney disease, 0.80. Conclusions: A set of prediction models to estimate multi-disease risk simultaneously from health checkup results may help to assess comprehensive individual health status and facilitate personalized prevention and early diagnosis.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.