ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2024
Histopathologic and molecular profile of gliomas diagnosed in Lagos, Nigeria.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State of high-grade glioma care in Africa: insights from a scoping review of the available published literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Establishment of a brain tumor consortium of Africa: Advancing collaborative research and advocacy for brain tumors in Africa.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The optimal diagnosis and management of patients with brain tumors currently uses the 2021 WHO integrated diagnosis of histomorphologic and molecular features. However, neuro-oncology practice in resource-limited settings usually relies solely on histomorphology. This study aimed to classify glioma cases diagnosed in the Department of Anatomic and Molecular Pathology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, using the 2021 WHO CNS tumor classification. Methods: Fifty-six brain tumors from 55 patients diagnosed with glioma between 2013 and 2021 were reevaluated for morphologic diagnosis. Molecular features were determined from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for IDH1-R132H, ATRX, BRAF-V600E, p53, Ki67, and H3-K27M, OncoScan chromosomal microarray for copy number, targeted next generation sequencing for mutation and fusion and methylation array profiling. Results: Of 55 central nervous system tumors, 3 were excluded from histomorphologic reevaluation for not being of glial or neuroepithelial origin. Of the remaining 52 patients, the median age was 20.5 years (range: 1 to 60 years), 38(73%) were males and 14(27%) were females. Seventy-one percent of the gliomas evaluated provided adequate DNA from archival FFPE tissue blocks. After applying the 2021 WHO diagnostic criteria the initial morphologic diagnosis changed for 35% (18/52) of cases. Diagnoses of 5 (9.6%) gliomas were upgraded, and 7 (14%) were downgraded. Conclusions: This study shows that the incorporation of molecular testing can considerably improve brain tumor diagnoses in Nigeria. Furthermore, this study highlights the diagnostic challenges in resource-limited settings and what is at stake in the global disparities of brain tumor diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.