Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554824›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2024

Market Status of Meat Analogs and Their Impact on Livestock Industries.

Da Young Lee, Colin Venter, Yeongwoo Choi, Jin Mo Park, Dahee Han, Jin Soo Kim, Ji Won Park, Seok Namkung, Ermie Mariano, Juhyun Lee and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Da Young LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-0815
Colin VenterDepartment Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4142-5809
Yeongwoo ChoiDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1882-4890
Jin Mo ParkDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9626-1025
Dahee HanDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6423-3414
Jin Soo KimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7974-7885
Ji Won ParkDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9500-5763
Seok NamkungDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4533-7971
Ermie MarianoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-4603
Juhyun LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-4447
Kyu-Hyun ParkDepartment of Animal Industry Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-5478
Aera JangDepartment of Animal Products and Food Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-8956
Gap Don-KimGraduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Institutes of Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang 25354, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2286-7639
Sun Jin HurDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-5852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The alternative meat industry, which aims to replace traditional livestock products, is experiencing growth. However, information regarding this industry remains limited, and plant-based meat analogs that have already entered the market are not growing as rapidly as initially anticipated. Moreover, the traditional livestock industry has significant concerns that the growth of meat analogs will encroach upon the livestock market and strongly opposes the approval of cultured meat and other meat analogs. In this study, we investigated the latest research on the production of plant-based meat analogs and examined the current market status of these products. We also predicted the impact of the growth of meat analogs on the livestock industry. Our findings indicate that the meat analog market has secured a substantial presence in the United States and European markets and is gradually expanding in major Asian countries, such as South Korea, China, and Japan. Additionally, while the meat analog market is growing slowly, the traditional livestock industry continues to expand. Furthermore, our analysis shows that the growth of the meat analog market, including plant-based meat analogs, has had a minimal impact on the traditional livestock market so far. Nevertheless, it is essential to continuously monitor potential market changes resulting from future advancements in meat analog technologies.

Indexed as

cultured meatmarket statusmeat analogsmycoprotein-based meatplant-based meat

Identifiers

PMID39554824
PMCPMC11564142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.