ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Longitudinal detection of somatic mutations in the saliva of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-affected patients: a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Multifeature sequencing-based liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis and monitoring.Genome medicine · 2026Review
- Longitudinal Exploratory Analysis of Salivary Microbiota Profiles in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Before and After Surgery: A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Salivary and Serum Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers for HPV-Associated Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Integrated analysis of oral rinse-derived and plasma circulating tumour DNA for mutation profiling and outcome prediction with oral squamous cell carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Salivary Biomarkers and Their Link to Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Diagnostic and Translational Perspectives in a Narrative Review.Oncology research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Liquid biopsy is gaining momentum for diagnosis and surveillance of cancer patients. Indeed, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is burdened with poor prognosis and high recurrence rates after treatment. It is therefore crucial to be able to detect minimal residual disease early after radical treatment or relapse, so surgery can be performed when the disease is still resectable. In this scenario, aim of this study is to create a liquid biopsy-based pipeline able to detect somatic tumor mutations in a cohort of HNSCC-affected patients undergoing follow-up after surgical intervention. Methods: Our cohort included 17 patients diagnosed with HNSCC over 4 years. The first saliva sample was collected before surgery while the rest were collected during the subsequent visits, according to the follow-up schedule. Salivary DNA (sDNA) was extracted, and a 52-gene next generation sequencing (NGS)-based panel was used for somatic variants detection. Results: 41.2% of samples collected before surgery bore a deleterious variant (n=7/17). Overall, 29.2% of samples harbored at least a pathogenic variant (n=21/72). The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (80%), FBXW7 (8%), PDGFRA (4%) and PTEN (4%). Finally, three patients experienced a loco-regional relapse by clinical evaluations, anticipated in 67% of cases by the molecular one (n=2/3). Discussion: Our data indicate that sDNA could aid in the monitoring of patients' follow-up as low-frequency somatic mutations could be assessed from the saliva of HNSCC patients. Prospectively, these results suggest that salivary-based liquid biopsy might pave the way for personalized molecular therapies based on mutational data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.