ReviewBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Hormone replacement therapy in surgical menopause after gynecological malignancies.
Review in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The vaginal microecological evaluation of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in uterine leiomyoma patients.BMC women's health · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review examines hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in cases of surgical menopause following gynecological malignancies. It aims to capture current knowledge, summarize recent findings, and provide recommendations for clinical settings. Unlike natural menopause, surgical menopause occurs abruptly, without an adjustment period, and is associated with a notably higher risk of fractures, arthritis, cognitive decline, dementia, Parkinson's disease, and various metabolic disorders affecting glucose and lipid levels-all of which contribute to an increased risk of major cardiovascular events. In 2017, The North American Menopause Society recommended that, barring contraindications, HRT should be initiated in women who enter surgical menopause before age 45. If these women do not experience vasomotor symptoms or other issues, HRT should be maintained consistently at least until age 52. This guideline reflects contemporary knowledge and is the result of a multidisciplinary consensus, based on a review of existing literature and several randomized clinical trials focusing on women who have survived gynecological cancers and whose quality of life is significantly impacted by surgical or early menopause. Estrogen supplementation is particularly beneficial, as it is linked to marked improvements in quality of life, including delayed onset of chronic cardiovascular issues, reduced fracture risk, enhanced cognitive function, reduced inflammation, and improved self-esteem, as well as better social and work performance. Clinical implementation of HRT, however, requires a highly individualized approach. This approach must consider the type and stage of malignancy, histopathological characteristics, risk factors for recurrence (such as diet, concurrent medications, medical history, and genetic predispositions), and a thorough assessment of the potential benefits and risks of HRT, as well as the patient's personal wishes and expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.