Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39556193›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025

Insights into interspecies protein binding variability using clindamycin as an example.

Hifza Ahmed, Michaela Böhmdorfer, Walter Jäger, Markus Zeitlinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hifza AhmedDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michaela BöhmdorferDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walter JägerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Markus ZeitlingerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 861323Marie Skłodowska Innovative Training NetworkTraining towards Innovative Personalized Antibiotic Therapy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the preclinical development of new drugs, animal models are often employed to predict their efficacy in humans, relying on translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies. We performed in vitro experiments focusing on the comparison of plasma protein binding (PPB) and bacterial growth dynamics of clindamycin, a commonly used antimicrobial agent, across a range of drug concentrations and plasma environments.

methodsHuman, bovine and rat plasma were used for determining PPB of clindamycin at various antibiotic concentrations in buffer and media containing 20% to 70% plasma or pure plasma using ultrafiltration (UF) and equilibrium dialysis (ED). Also bacterial growth and time-kill assays were performed in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) containing various percentages of plasma.

resultsProtein binding of clindamycin correlated well between UF and ED. Notably, clindamycin exhibited substantially lower protein binding to rat plasma compared with human and bovine plasma. Staphylococcus aureus growth was significantly reduced in 70% human, bovine, and rat plasma after 4, 8 and 24 h compared with standard MHB. Time-kill data demonstrated that bacterial counts at both 20% and 70% plasmas were less when compared with MHB at drug concentrations lower than MIC after 4 and 8 h of incubation. For rat plasma, the difference was maintained over 24 h of incubation. Furthermore, a complete bacterial killing at 16 mg/L was observed after 24 h in 20% and 70% human and bovine plasma, but not for rat plasma.

conclusionsRecognizing interspecies differences in PB might be essential for optimizing the translational relevance of preclinical studies.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBlood ProteinsClindamycinStaphylococcus aureusAnimalsCattleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProtein BindingRatsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood ProteinsClindamycin

Identifiers

PMID39556193
PMCPMC11787889

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.