ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Predicting Asthma Exacerbations Using Machine Learning Models.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of type 2 inflammation-related biomarkers in risk prediction models for acute exacerbations in adult asthma: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A lifecycle governance and learning health system framework for trustworthy, generalizable, and sustainable human-ai partnership in clinical practice: Lessons from the asthma-guidance and prediction system (A-GPS).Journal of the National Medical Association · 2026Review
- Evolution, hotspots, and future directions of artificial intelligence in asthma research: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis [2016-2026].Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Harnessing Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record Data to Improve Asthma Management.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Respiratory sound-based AI screening of asthma and COPD via multi-feature fusion and CatBoost classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Improving machine-learning development in allergology: bridging the gap between open-access and cohort-based databases.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Review
- A clinician-oriented machine learning model for adult asthma exacerbation prediction: comparative analysis of nine algorithms.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Bidirectional Associations Between Seborrheic Dermatitis and Epithelial Barrier Diseases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Allergy · 2026Article
- Agreement Between ICD-10 Code-Only and Composite Definitions of Asthma Exacerbations in Electronic Health Records: A Multicenter Cohort Study in Taiwan, 2017-2023.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- CLDN8 and ABCA12 define a shared molecular signature in ulcerative colitis-psoriasis comorbidity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Innovative Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Whole-Course Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Developing a prediction model for persistent airflow limitation in asthmatic children.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Detecting heart failure in severe asthma patients using speckle tracking echocardiography.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Identifying and characterising asthma subgroups at high risk of severe exacerbations using machine learning and longitudinal real-world data.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Predicting Asthma Exacerbations Using Machine Learning Models".Advances in therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough clinical, functional, and biomarker data predict asthma exacerbations, newer approaches providing high accuracy of prognosis are needed for real-world decision-making in asthma. Machine learning (ML) leverages mathematical and statistical methods to detect patterns for future disease events across large datasets from electronic health records (EHR). This study conducted training and fine-tuning of ML algorithms for the real-world prediction of asthma exacerbations in patients with physician-diagnosed asthma.
methodsAdults with ≥ 2 ICD9/10 asthma codes within 1 year and at least 30 days apart were identified from the Optum Panther EHR database between 2016 and 2023. An emergency department (ED), urgent care, or inpatient visit for asthma, while on systemic administration of corticosteroids, was considered an exacerbation. To predict factors associated with exacerbations in a 6-month study period, clinical information from patients was retrieved in the preceding 6-month baseline period. Clinical information included demographics, lab results, diagnoses, medications, immunizations, and allergies. Three models built using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Transformers algorithms were trained and tested on independent datasets. Predictions were explained using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) library.
resultsOf 1,331,934 patients with asthma, 16,279 (1.2%) experienced ≥ 1 exacerbation. XGBoost was the best predictive algorithm (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.964). Factors associated with exacerbations included a prior history of exacerbation, prednisone usage, high-dose albuterol usage, and elevated troponin I. Reduced probability of exacerbations was associated with receiving inhaled albuterol, vitamins, aspirin, statins, furosemide, and influenza vaccination.
conclusionThis ML-based study on asthma in the real world confirmed previously known features associated with increased exacerbation risk for asthma, while uncovering not entirely understood features associated with reduced risk of asthma exacerbations. These findings are hypothesis-generating and should contribute to ongoing discussion of the strengths and limitations of ML and other supervised learning models in patient risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.