SynthesisPediatric surgery international2024
Genetic landscape of congenital pouch colon: systematic review and functional enrichment study.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite extensive clinical documentation, few studies have explored the genetic basis of congenital pouch colon (CPC) which is crucial for early detection, personalized treatment, and genetic counselling.
objectiveTo compile the information on the genetic basis of CPC and the functional enrichment of underlying molecular pathways. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The implicated genes were investigated for underlying molecular pathways. A network was subsequently created on String-database followed by gene-ontology analysis.
resultsThe study included 20 CPC cases and 52 controls (across 4 studies). Numerous variants, including 24 missense SNPs, 63 frameshift variants, and stop-gain/stop-loss mutations in 11 genes were identified. Notable genetic markers included MUC5B, FRG1, and TAF1B, with potential roles in mucosal barrier functions, colonic muscular development, and ribosomal RNA transcription, respectively. Copy number variants and lnc-EPB41-1-1 were also implicated. Genetic hotspots were identified on chromosomes 11, 17 and 16. RGPD2 and RGPD4, contributing to GTPase activator activity and known to be associated with bowel/colon, were differentially expressed. Pathway analysis highlighted Wnt and HOX pathways, with JAG1 and MLL relevant to CPC pathogenesis.
conclusionThe study integrates genetic evidence and pathway analysis, shedding light on the complex genetic architecture of CPC. While the importance of genetic markers in the etiopathogenesis of CPC is underscored, the need for validating the findings on larger cohorts, diverse populations and through functional studies is suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39557707What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.