ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Deep learning insights into distinct patterns of polygenic adaptation across human populations.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Classics: The Synergy of AI and Genomics Reveals an Expanded Repertoire of Pigmentation Genes.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2026Review
- Bringing environment back into human evolution: why human genetics needs genome-environment association studies.Human genetics · 2026Review
- The genetic architecture of human skin pigmentation: evolution and adaptation across global populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- A Systematic Review: Deep Learning for Analyzing Genomic Data to Discover Evolutionary Patterns.Scientifica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Response to spatiotemporal variation in selection gradients resulted in signatures of polygenic adaptation in human genomes. We introduce RAISING, a two-stage deep learning framework that optimizes neural network architecture through hyperparameter tuning before performing feature selection and prediction tasks. We tested RAISING on published and newly designed simulations that incorporate the complex interplay between demographic history and selection gradients. RAISING outperformed Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS), ridge regression and DeepGenomeScan, with significantly higher true positive rates (TPR) in detecting genetic adaptation. It reduced computational time by 60-fold and increased TPR by up to 28% compared to DeepGenomeScan on published data. In more complex demographic simulations, RAISING showed lower false discoveries and significantly higher TPR, up to 17-fold, compared to other methods. RAISING demonstrated robustness with least sensitivity to demographic history, selection gradient and their interactions. We developed a sliding window method for genome-wide implementation of RAISING to overcome the computational challenges of high-dimensional genomic data. Applied to African, European, South Asian and East Asian populations, we identified multiple genomic regions undergoing polygenic selection. Notably, ∼70% of the regions identified in Africans are unique, with broad patterns distinguishing them from non-Africans, corroborating the Out of Africa dispersal model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.