Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558242›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer by a clinical-deep learning radiomics model : Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy patients.

Yuxin Zhang, Xu Cheng, Xianli Luo, Ruixia Sun, Xiang Huang, Lingling Liu, Min Zhu, Xueling Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Applications of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: A State-of-the-Art Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuxin Zhang *School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Xu Cheng *Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, P.R. China.
Xianli LuoDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Ruixia SunHefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, P.R. China.
Xiang HuangHefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, P.R. China. 10244575@qq.com.
Lingling LiuHefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, P.R. China.
Min ZhuHefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, P.R. China. jmmlyct@163.com.
Xueling LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China. xlli@cmpt.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal fistula (EF), a rare and potentially fatal complication, can be better managed with predictive models for personalized treatment plans in esophageal cancers. We aim to develop a clinical-deep learning radiomics model for effectively predicting the occurrence of EF.

methodsThe study involved esophageal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Arterial phase enhanced CT images were used to extract handcrafted and deep learning radiomic features. Along with clinical information, a 3-step feature selection method (statistical tests, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, and Recursive Feature Elimination) was used to identify five feature sets in training cohort for constructing random forest EF prediction models. Model performance was compared and validated in both retrospective and prospective test cohorts.

resultsOne hundred seventy five patients (122 in training and 53 in test cohort)were retrospectively collected from April 2018 to June 2022. An additional 27 patients were enrolled as a prospective test cohort from June 2022 to December 2023. Post-selection in the training cohort, five feature sets were used for model construction: clinical, handcrafted radiomic, deep learning radiomic, clinical-handcrafted radiomic, and clinical-deep learning radiomic. The clinical-deep learning radiomic model excelled with AUC of 0.89 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.83-0.95) in the training cohort, 0.81 (0.65-0.94) in the test cohort, and 0.85 (0.71-0.97) in the prospective test cohort. Brier-score and calibration curve analyses validated its predictive ability.

conclusionsThe clinical-deep learning radiomic model can effectively predict EF in patients with advanced esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyDeep LearningEsophageal FistulaEsophageal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep learningEsophageal fistulaPredictive modelRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39558242
PMCPMC11571992

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.