Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39558307›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Construction and SHAP interpretability analysis of a risk prediction model for feeding intolerance in preterm newborns based on machine learning.

Hui Xu, Xingwang Peng, Ziyu Peng, Rui Wang, Rui Zhou, Lianguo Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui XuDepartment of Medical Records & Statistics, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xingwang PengChangjiang Road Community Health Service Center, Zhangmiao Street, Baoshan District, Shanghai, China.
Ziyu PengDepartment of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Rui Zhou *The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China. 1176034941@qq.com.
Lianguo Fu *Department of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China. lianguofu@bbmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3619-4858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo construct a highly accurate and interpretable feeding intolerance (FI) risk prediction model for preterm newborns based on machine learning (ML) to assist medical staff in clinical diagnosis.

methodsIn this study, a sample of 350 hospitalized preterm newborns were retrospectively analysed. First, dual feature selection was conducted to identify important feature variables for model construction. Second, ML models were constructed based on the logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms, after which random sampling and tenfold cross-validation were separately used to evaluate and compare these models and identify the optimal model. Finally, we apply the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) interpretable framework to analyse the decision-making principles of the optimal model and expound upon the important factors affecting FI in preterm newborns and their modes of action.

resultsThe accuracy of XGBoost was 87.62%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 92.2%. After the application of tenfold cross-validation, the accuracy was 83.43%, and the AUC was 89.45%, which was significantly better than those of the other models. Analysis of the XGBoost model with the SHAP interpretable framework showed that a history of resuscitation, use of probiotics, milk opening time, interval between two stools and gestational age were the main factors affecting the occurrence of FI in preterm newborns, yielding importance scores of 0.632, 0.407, 0.313, 0.313, and 0.258, respectively. A history of resuscitation, first milk opening time ≥ 24 h and interval between stools ≥ 3 days were risk factors for FI, while the use of probiotics and gestational age ≥ 34 weeks were protective factors against FI in preterm newborns.

conclusionsIn practice, we should improve perinatal care and obstetrics with the aim of reducing the occurrence of hypoxia and preterm delivery. When feeding, early milk opening, the use of probiotics, the stimulation of defecation and other measures should be implemented with the aim of reducing the occurrence of FI.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureMachine LearningFemaleFood IntoleranceHumansInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentFeeding intoleranceMachine learningModel constructionPreterm newborn

Identifiers

PMID39558307
PMCPMC11572196

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.