ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Construction and SHAP interpretability analysis of a risk prediction model for feeding intolerance in preterm newborns based on machine learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of an XGBoost-SHAP Model for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Elderly Cardiovascular Patients With Polypharmacy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Emerging role of artificial intelligence in necrotizing enterocolitis and implementation challenges.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Development and interpretability of a machine learning-derived model for the identification of latent prostate cancer in patients initially diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Review
- Article
- Geospatial and machine learning analyses of cardiovascular disease mortality across the continental United States: Identifying associated variables using Shapley values.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Noninvasive prescreening of pediatric adenoid hypertrophy using quantified MFCC statistics and clinical features: development and external validation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the liver fibrosis and waist-to-height ratio(LFWHR) as a gallstone disease predictor: a nomogram model and SHAP analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Transcriptome Analysis of Keratoconus for Predictive Biomarker Identification.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Development of a Predictive Model for Neonatal Hospital-Acquired Gastrointestinal Infections Utilizing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo construct a highly accurate and interpretable feeding intolerance (FI) risk prediction model for preterm newborns based on machine learning (ML) to assist medical staff in clinical diagnosis.
methodsIn this study, a sample of 350 hospitalized preterm newborns were retrospectively analysed. First, dual feature selection was conducted to identify important feature variables for model construction. Second, ML models were constructed based on the logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms, after which random sampling and tenfold cross-validation were separately used to evaluate and compare these models and identify the optimal model. Finally, we apply the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) interpretable framework to analyse the decision-making principles of the optimal model and expound upon the important factors affecting FI in preterm newborns and their modes of action.
resultsThe accuracy of XGBoost was 87.62%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 92.2%. After the application of tenfold cross-validation, the accuracy was 83.43%, and the AUC was 89.45%, which was significantly better than those of the other models. Analysis of the XGBoost model with the SHAP interpretable framework showed that a history of resuscitation, use of probiotics, milk opening time, interval between two stools and gestational age were the main factors affecting the occurrence of FI in preterm newborns, yielding importance scores of 0.632, 0.407, 0.313, 0.313, and 0.258, respectively. A history of resuscitation, first milk opening time ≥ 24 h and interval between stools ≥ 3 days were risk factors for FI, while the use of probiotics and gestational age ≥ 34 weeks were protective factors against FI in preterm newborns.
conclusionsIn practice, we should improve perinatal care and obstetrics with the aim of reducing the occurrence of hypoxia and preterm delivery. When feeding, early milk opening, the use of probiotics, the stimulation of defecation and other measures should be implemented with the aim of reducing the occurrence of FI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.