ReviewInternational journal of women's health2024
Practical Guidance on the Use of Vaginal Laser Therapy: Focus on Genitourinary Syndrome and Other Symptoms.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of a Mixed Wavelength Laser for Vaginal Health in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of women's health · 2025Trial
- Article
- Diode Laser and Radiofrequency for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Comparative Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Non-Invasive Monopolar Radiofrequency for Treating Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Prospective Pilot Study.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of the Er:YAG Laser in Snoring Treatment Based on Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genitourinary syndrome of the menopause (GSM) is a chronic, often progressive condition, characterised by symptoms relating to oestrogen deficiency including; vaginal dryness, burning, itching, dyspareunia, dysuria, urinary urgency and recurrent urinary tract infections. GSM affects up to 70% of breast cancer survivors with a tendency to particularly severe symptoms, owing to the effects of iatrogenic menopause and endocrine therapy. Patients and clinicians can be reluctant to replace oestrogen vaginally due to fear of cancer recurrence. Vaginal laser is a novel therapy, which may become a valuable nonhormonal alternative in GSM treatment. There are currently 6 published studies regarding Erbium:YAG laser treatment for GSM, 41 studies regarding CO2 laser treatment for GSM and 28 studies regarding vaginal laser treatment for GSM in breast cancer survivors. Number of participants ranges from 12 to 645. The majority of studies describe a course of 3 treatments, but some report outcomes after 5. Significant improvements were reported in vaginal dryness, burning, dyspareunia, itch, Vaginal Health Index Scores (VHIS), Quality of Life, and FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index). Most studies reported outcomes at short-term follow-up from 30 days to 12 months post-treatment. Few studies report longer-term outcomes with conflicting results. Whilst some studies suggest improvements are sustained up to 24 months, others report a drop-off in symptom improvement at 12-18 months. Patient satisfaction ranged from 52% to 90% and deteriorated with increasing time post-procedure in one study. The findings in this review must be validated in robust randomised sham-controlled trials of adequate power. There remain a number of unanswered questions in terms of which laser medium to use, optimal device settings, ideal interval between treatments, pre-treatment vaginal preparation, as well as safety and efficacy of repeated treatments long term. These issues could be addressed most efficiently with a mandatory registry of vaginal laser procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.