ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2024
Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Response to Meal Sequence Among Healthy UAE Adults: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of meal sequence intervention on blood glucose response in healthy adults: a systematic review.Clinical nutrition research · 2026Article
- Food order affects blood glucose and insulin levels in women with gestational diabetes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dietary patterns that lower postprandial glycemia have been effective in preventing type 2 diabetes. Consuming macronutrients in a specific sequence within a meal has been considered as a novel strategy to reduce post-meal glucose spikes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of meal sequence on postprandial glucose and insulin response among healthy adults in the United Arab Emirates. Methods: Eighteen healthy adults participated in a cross-over randomized controlled trial. Two isocaloric meals were consumed separately in a different order: a standard mixed meal (SMM) vs vegetables and protein first followed by carbohydrates (VPF) meal. The postprandial glucose and insulin levels were determined at Fasting, 30, 60, and 120 min. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) rating was used to assess hunger at similar frequencies. Results: The mean glucose and insulin levels significantly reduced (p = 0.001) following VPF meal compared to SMM at 30 min. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC0-120) for glucose following the VPF meal sequence was 40.9% lower (p = 0.03) compared with the SMM (572.83; 95% CI 157.3 to 988.2) vs (968.5; 95% CI 692.4 to 1244.8 mg/dL). Furthermore, the iAUC0-120 for insulin following the VPF meal sequence was 31.7% lower than the SMM meal sequence. (2184; 95% CI 1638.30 to 2729) vs (3196.94; 95% CI 2328.19 to 4065.69) mIU/mL × 120 min, P = 0.023). The feeling of fullness measured by the hunger scale showed that the feeling of fullness was higher after 60 and 120 minutes (p = 0.05, p = 0.04) with the VPF meal sequence compared to the SMM sequence. Although, there is no significant difference in the Area under the curve (AUC) for hunger rating between the two meals. Conclusion: The VPF meal sequence could significantly reduce postprandial glucose and insulin levels and sustain fullness after a meal. Meal sequencing could be an effective dietary strategy for improving the postprandial glucose and insulin response in healthy adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.