ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
Using deep learning and large protein language models to predict protein-membrane interfaces of peripheral membrane proteins.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChemBioParis 2025: Approaching Biology Through Chemistry in the City of Light.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
- PepMCP: a graph-based membrane contact probability predictor for membrane-lytic antimicrobial peptides.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Protein Language Models: Applications and Perspectives.Journal of proteome research · 2026Review
- MPLID (Membrane Protein-Lipid Interaction Database): A Large-Scale Experimental Resource of Residue-Level Protein-Lipid Contacts.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Large Context, Deeper Insights: Harnessing Large Language Models for Advancing Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Characterizing interactions at the protein-membrane interface is crucial as abnormal peripheral protein-membrane attachment is involved in the onset of many diseases. However, a limiting factor in studying and understanding protein-membrane interactions is that the membrane-binding domains of peripheral membrane proteins (PMPs) are typically unknown. By applying artificial intelligence techniques in the context of natural language processing (NLP), the accuracy and prediction time for protein-membrane interface analysis can be significantly improved compared to existing methods. Here, we assess whether NLP and protein language models (pLMs) can be used to predict membrane-interacting amino acids for PMPs. Results: We utilize available experimental data and generate protein embeddings from two pLMs (ProtTrans and ESM) to train classifier models. Overall, the results demonstrate the first proof of concept study and the promising potential of using deep learning and pLMs to predict protein-membrane interfaces for PMPs faster, with similar accuracy, and without the need for 3D structural data compared to existing tools. Availability and implementation: The code is available at https://github.com/zoecournia/pLM-PMI. All data are available in the Supplementary material.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.