Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39559885›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2024

Performance of a Short Version of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-12) to Detect Cognitive Impairment.

M Manjavong, A Diaz, M T Ashford, A Aaronson, M J Miller, J M Kang, S Mackin, R Tank, B Landavazo, D Truran and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M ManjavongRachel L. Nosheny, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, University of California, San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry, San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement Street (114M), San Francisco, CA 94121, Tel: 650-468-0619, Fax: 415-668-2864, email: rachel.nosheny@ucsf.edu.
A Diaz
M T Ashford
A Aaronson
M J Miller
J M Kang
S Mackin
R Tank
B Landavazo
D Truran
S T Farias
M Weiner
R Nosheny

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI MONICA G. RIVERA-MINDT · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072972 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Charles DeCarli, Rachel A Whitmer · 2021 to 2026
$25.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Everyday Cognition (ECog) 12-item scale, a functional decline measurement, can distinguish dementia from cognitively unimpaired (CU). Limited data compare ECog-12 performance by raters (self vs. informant) and scoring systems (average numeric vs. categorical grouping) to differentiate cognitive statuses.

objectivesTo evaluate the performance of ECog-12 in differentiation cognitive statuses.

designA cross-sectional diagnostic test study. SETTING AND

participantsData from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study are analyzed. Participants were aged 55-90 years old divided into subgroups based on diagnostic criteria. MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated ECog-12 performance across different diagnostic groups, such as CU vs cognitive impairment (CI; mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia), and the association between ECog-12 and CI. This procedure was repeated for self- and partner (informant)-reports. Additionally, types of ECog scores were also assessed, where an average ECog score was calculated (continuous numeric) as well as a categorical grouping ("any occasional declined" or "any consistently declined") based on item-level responses to ECog questions.

resultsECog-12 cut-off scores of 1.36 (self-reported) and 1.45 (partner-reported) distinguish CU from CI with AUC 0.7 and 0.78, respectively. Adding a memory-concern question improved self-reported-ECog AUC to 0.79. Self- and partner-reported "consistently-declined" ECog-12 categorical grouping provided AUC 0.69 and 0.78. The study partner reported ECog-12 showed a greater association with CI than self-reported, with odds ratios of 35.45 and 8.79, respectively.

conclusionStudy partner-reported ECog scores performed better than self-reported ECog-12 in differentiating cognitive statuses, and a higher study partner reported ECog score was a higher prognostic risk for CI. A memory concern question could enhance self-reported ECog-12 performance. This further emphasizes the need to obtain data from study partners for research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsAlzheimer’s diseaseA short version ECog-12dementiaECog-12everyday cognition scaleMCI

Identifiers

PMID39559885
PMCPMC11573828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.