SynthesisPloS one2024
From meta-analysis to Mendelian randomization: Unidirectional perspectives on the association of glaucoma with depression and anxiety.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The bidirectional enigma of glaucoma and anxiety: from neuroinflammatory mechanisms to mind-body integrated therapies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Depression and Anxiety After Topical Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Evidence for the association between psychological stress and peri-implant health among middle-aged and elderly adults: A systemic review.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Glaucoma and brain functional networks: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlaucoma, a primary cause of blindness worldwide, has its association with depression and anxiety noted, yet the understanding of such association is still rudimentary. This study aims to provide the unidirectional perspectives on the association of glaucoma with depression and anxiety, informing public health strategies.
methodsThe Meta-analysis screened observational studies from Medline, Embase, and Web of Science, using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment. It employed R's 'meta' package to assess the association between glaucoma and depression or anxiety prevalence. The Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis was conducted using R's 'TwoSampleMR' package, based on data from the IEU database data to explore the impact of glaucoma on depression and anxiety.
resultsThis Meta-analysis included 23 out of 379 studies involving 11,845 glaucoma patients. The combined prevalence of depression among glaucoma patients, derived from 18 cross-sectional studies, stood at 19.42%. Five case-control studies indicated that glaucoma patients had a 6.17-fold higher risk of depression compared to controls. Derived from 16 cross-sectional studies, the consolidated prevalence for anxiety was 19.07%. According to five case-control studies, glaucoma patients exhibited a 4.45-fold increased risk of anxiety compared to controls. MR analysis failed to uncover a causal effect of glaucoma on depression and anxiety.
conclusionThis study suggests that glaucoma patients may experience higher prevalence of depression and anxiety than the general population, with no clear genetic links found. It suggests that environmental factors and non-genetic biological pathways, among others, may play significant roles in their association, though the role of genetic factors cannot be ruled out. These findings highlight the necessity of a comprehensive approach to study the complex factors influencing the association of glaucoma with depression or anxiety and underscore the importance of integrating mental health considerations into glaucoma management to improve medication adherence and disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.