Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39561982›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2025

Determination of Hormonal Growth Promotants in Beef Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Mary Mosburg, Yajing Li, Emily Helmes, Tara D Falt, Josephine F Trott, Gina Solomon, Russell C Hovey, Benjamin C Moeller

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Estimated human intake of endogenous and exogenous hormones from beef in the United States.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mary MosburgKL Maddy Equine Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Yajing LiKL Maddy Equine Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Emily HelmesKL Maddy Equine Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Tara D FaltDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Josephine F TrottDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-7685
Gina SolomonDivision of Occupational, Environmental, and Climate Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Russell C HoveyDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Benjamin C MoellerKL Maddy Equine Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-3620

Funding

California Breast Cancer Research Program B26PB1629California Breast Cancer Research Program B26PB1982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hormonal growth promotants (HGPs) are a class of pharmaceutical agents commonly administered to cattle in the United States to improve growth rates of the animal, alter behavior, or to improve the desired characteristics of retail cuts of meat. There is a concern that low residual concentrations of HGPs may remain in tissue after slaughter, and consumption of tissues containing these compounds may increase the risk of adverse health outcomes, including cancer. Sensitive and selective methods are necessary to assess exposure of HGPs by populations that consume meat products from animals that may have been administered HGPs. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated to detect the low-level presence of HGPs including estradiol, testosterone, estradiol benzoate, melengestrol, melengestrol acetate, progesterone, testosterone propionate, trenbolone, trenbolone acetate, and α-zearalanol in retail cuts of meat following a liquid-liquid extraction using a high pH solution with 30-50× less mass of meat required as compared to similar approaches. Good chromatographic performance and sensitivity was achieved utilizing ammonium fluoride as a mobile phase additive without the need for derivatization. Validation parameters including accuracy, precision, recovery, matrix effects, limits of detection, limits of quantitation, linear range, and stability were determined. The limits of detection ranged from 0.1 to 1.0 ng/g, depending on the compound, with adequate accuracy and precision without the need for extensive sample preparation approaches.

Indexed as

Anabolic AgentsDrug ResiduesRed MeatTandem Mass SpectrometryAnimalsCattleChromatography, LiquidLimit of DetectionLiquid-Liquid ExtractionAnabolic Agentscattlehormonal growth promotantsliquid chromatography–mass spectrometrysteroids

Identifiers

PMID39561982
PMCPMC12319502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.