SynthesisJournal of ultrasound2025
FibroScan's evolution: a critical 20-year review.
Synthesis in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound elastography in pediatric care: bridging innovation and noninvasive diagnostics.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Non-invasive ultrasound assessment of chronic liver disease: current position and future directions for a "one-stop" liver ultrasound approach.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for the assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosisWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Transient Elastography and Fibroscan: Stethoscope of a Hepatologist in Today's World.Current hepatology reports · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Tests as a Replacement for Liver Biopsy in the Assessment of MASLD.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- A negative correlation of low estimated glucose disposal rate with significant liver fibrosis in adults with NAFLD and obesity: results from NHANES 2017-2020.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing MASLD: How Artificial Intelligence Is Shaping the Future of Liver Care.Cancers · 2025Review
- Performance of APRI and FIB-4 Scores Compared to FibroScan: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Black Sub-Saharan African Population.Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
FibroScan, initially designed for assessing cheese maturity, has evolved into a crucial medical tool for liver fibrosis diagnosis. This systematic review explores its development history, functionality, and pros and cons compared to traditional liver biopsy. Precision in various clinical settings is scrutinised, emphasising FibroScan's accuracy in conditions like NAFLD and viral-induced liver disease. The article also delves into its potential in paediatrics, its relevance in monitoring COVID-19-related liver complications, and its role in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma risk, Technical aspects, including transducers, imaging integration, and portability, are examined. Various methods for evaluating liver fibrosis are discussed, highlighting FibroScan's suitability for advanced stages, contrasting with the gold standard of liver biopsy for early stages. The impact of FibroScan on long-term liver conditions is emphasised, focusing on early detection, progression monitoring, reduced invasive biopsies, and hepatocellular carcinoma risk prediction. This systematic review underscores FibroScan's transformative potential in liver disease treatment and predicts ongoing research to enhance early detection, disease monitoring, and explore new clinical applications. Anticipated advances include FibroScan-guided liver biopsy, artificial intelligence data analysis, and point-of-care device development, promising a further revolution in liver disease management. The article concludes with optimistic prospects for FibroScan's future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.