Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39563228›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

An integrated physiological indicator and transcriptomic analysis reveals the response of soybean buds to high-temperature stress.

Jiajia Li, Meiyan Wu, Haoran Chen, Wei Liao, Shu Yao, Ying Wei, Heng Wang, Qun Long, Xiaoyu Hu, Wei Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiajia Li *School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Meiyan Wu *School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Haoran Chen *School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Wei LiaoSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Shu YaoSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Ying WeiSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Heng WangSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Qun LongSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Xiaoyu HuSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Wei WangSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Guoji WangSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Lijuan QiuKey Laboratory of Crop Gene Resource and Germplasm Enhancement (MOA), Institute of Crop Sciences, The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China. qiulijuan@caas.cn.
Xiaobo WangSchool of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China. wxbphd@163.com.

Funding

Anhui Provincial Financial Agricultural Science and Technology Achievement Transformation Project 2024ZH018National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD1201603-4Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, China 2208085MC61the Colleges and Universities Nature Science Foundation of Anhui Province,China KJ2021A0200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnder global warming, high temperature (HT) has become a major meteorological factor affecting soybean production. To explore the candidate genes and regulatory mechanism of the soybean bud response to HT stress, previously identified as HT-tolerant ('Handou14'; HD14) and HT-sensitive ('Jiadou36'; JD36) were treated for 5 days in an artificial climate incubator either with HT (43 °C (day)/ 33 °C (night), 16 h light/8 h darkness) or the non-stress growth condition (25 °C, 16 h light/8 h darkness) as the control at the bud stage were used as experimental materials in this study. After HT treatment, changes in physiological indicators including hypocotyl length, enzyme activity and hormone content were detected; at the same time, the cotyledons, hypocotyls, and main roots were collected for transcriptome sequencing analysis. Analyzing the mechanisms of HT stress response in the bud stage of HD14 and JD36 at physiological and transcription levels.

resultsAnalysis of physiological indicator showed that the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were significantly increased 47.4% and 41.2% in the cotyledon of HD14 and the main root of JD36, and the contents of peroxidase (POD) were significantly increased 61.5% and 125% in the hypocotyl of HD14 and JD36; the contents of malonaldehyde (MDA) were significantly increased 44.8% and 22.2% in the main root of HD14 and JD36 after HT treatment. The content of abscisic acid (ABA) were significantly increased 1.9 fold and 1.2 fold in the root of HD14 and JD36 in response to HT treatment, whereas the content of gibberellin (GA) were decreased 2.2 fold and 1.3 fold in the cotyledon and root, and increased 1.6 fold in the hypocotyl in HD14 (P < 0.05). Thus, higher SOD and POD activities, higher ABA content, and a smaller increase in MDA content may improve tolerance to HT stress. The HT-tolerant cultivar may have stronger GA signal transduction in the hypocotyl to combat the negative effects of HT. RNA-sequencing was performed to analyze the differential expression of genes in buds of the two cultivars under the HT treatment and control condition. In total, 3,633, 1,964, 9,934, and 3,036 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in the CH (control group of HD14) vs. TH (HT-treatment group of HD14), CJ (control group of JD36) vs. TJ (HT-treatment group of JD36), TJ vs. TH, and CJ vs. CH comparison groups, respectively. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that most DEGs were mainly involved in metabolic processes, catalytic activity, carbohydrate, energy transduction, and signaling pathways. The results of qRT-PCR validation (86.67%) and changes in physiological indicators were consistent with the RNA-sequencing data. Five DEGs were selected as candidate genes in the response to HT stress at the bud stage.

conclusionIn summary, soybean cells are protected from oxidative damage by an increase in antioxidant enzyme activities and accumulation of hormone content under HT stress. Concomitantly, changes in the expression of crucial genes and signal transmission processes are induced, thus initiating adaptive and protective mechanisms. This study provides a theoretical basis for clarification of the physiological and molecular mechanisms in the response to HT stress of soybean bud.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGlycine maxCotyledonGene Expression Regulation, PlantHot TemperatureHypocotylPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant RootsStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomePlant Growth RegulatorsBudHigh temperature stressMolecular mechanismPhysiologySoybean

Identifiers

PMID39563228
PMCPMC11577741

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.