ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
DAPNet: multi-view graph contrastive network incorporating disease clinical and molecular associations for disease progression prediction.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MELGene: knowledge-enhanced multimodel ensemble learning for disease-gene association prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTimely and accurate prediction of disease progress is crucial for facilitating early intervention and treatment for various chronic diseases. However, due to the complicated and longitudinal nature of disease progression, the capacity and completeness of clinical data required for training deep learning models remains a significant challenge. This study aims to explore a new method that reduces data dependency and achieves predictive performance comparable to existing research.
methodsThis study proposed DAPNet, a deep learning-based disease progression prediction model that solely utilizes the comorbidity duration (without relying on multi-modal data or comprehensive medical records) and disease associations from biomedical knowledge graphs to deliver high-performance prediction. DAPNet is the first to apply multi-view graph contrastive learning to disease progression prediction tasks. Compared with other studies on comorbidities, DAPNet innovatively integrates molecular-level disease association information, combines disease co-occurrence and ICD10, and fully explores the associations between diseases;
resultsThis study validated DAPNet using a de-identified clinical dataset derived from medical claims, which includes 2,714 patients and 10,856 visits. Meanwhile, a kidney dataset (606 patients) based on MIMIC-IV has also been constructed to fully validate its performance. The results showed that DAPNet achieved state-of-the-art performance on the severe pneumonia dataset (F1=0.84, with an improvement of 8.7%), and outperformed the six baseline models on the kidney disease dataset (F1=0.80, with an improvement of 21.3%). Through case analysis, we elucidated the clinical and molecular associations identified by the DAPNet model, which facilitated a better understanding and explanation of potential disease association, thereby providing interpretability for the model.
conclusionsThe proposed DAPNet, for the first time, utilizes comorbidity duration and disease associations network, enabling more accurate disease progression prediction based on a multi-view graph contrastive learning, which provides valuable insights for early diagnosis and treatment of patients. Based on disease association networks, our research has enhanced the interpretability of disease progression predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.