ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Clinical pharmacist-led antifungal drug utilization reviews in cancer care hospital: a prospective audit and feedback.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The global rise in systemic fungal infections and increased antifungal use underscores the need for pharmacist-led antifungal stewardship in oncology but data on such interventions are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical pharmacist-led antifungal drug utilization reviews for optimizing antifungal therapy in a specialized cancer care hospital. Patients and Method: This pharmacist-led prospective audit and feedback study evaluated 350 admitted patients with cancer who were prescribed systemic antifungals. Electronic medical records of the included patients were reviewed to evaluate pharmacist interventions. Data were entered and analysed through SPSS version 21. Result: Most of the patients were prescribed antifungals for suspected fungal infections (41.7%). Febrile neutropenia was present in 55.4% of patients. The most frequently isolated fungus was Conclusion: Pharmacists play a crucial role in optimizing antifungal therapy by conducting drug utilization reviews and implementing targeted interventions. These interventions are beneficial for overall management of patients with cancer and improving the quality of antifungal prescribing.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.