Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39564513›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2024

Culturally responsive strategies and practical considerations for live tissue studies in Māori participant cohorts.

Helena Abolins-Thompson, Kimiora L Henare, Bridget Simonson, Mark Chaffin, Patrick T Ellinor, Claire Henry, Mairarangi Haimona, Jake Aitken, Taku Parai, Bianca Elkington and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Hyperuricaemia and gout in the Pacific.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Helena Abolins-ThompsonDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesia, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Kimiora L HenareFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bridget SimonsonCardiovascular Disease Initiative, The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Mark ChaffinCardiovascular Disease Initiative, The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Patrick T EllinorCardiovascular Disease Initiative, The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Claire HenryDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesia, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mairarangi HaimonaDepartment of General Surgery, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jake AitkenTe Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Taku ParaiTe Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira, Porirua, New Zealand.
Bianca ElkingtonTe Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira, Porirua, New Zealand.
Michael RongoTe Rūnanga o Toa Rangatira, Porirua, New Zealand.
Kirsty M DanielsonDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesia, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Megan P LeaskDepartment of Physiology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Indigenous communities globally are inequitably affected by non-communicable diseases such as cancer and coronary artery disease. Increased focus on personalized medicine approaches for the treatment of these diseases offers opportunities to improve the health of Indigenous people. Conversely, poorly implemented approaches pose increased risk of further exacerbating current inequities in health outcomes for Indigenous peoples. The advancement of modern biology techniques, such as three-dimensional (3D) Methods: This project discusses the use of 3D tumor organoids and single cell/nucleus RNA sequencing to study cancer treatment responses and explore immune cell roles in coronary artery disease. Using key pillars from currently available Indigenous bioethics frameworks, strategies were developed for the use of Māori participant samples for live tissue and sequencing studies. These were based on extensive collaborations with local Māori community, scientific leaders, clinical experts, and international collaborators from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Issues surrounding the use of live tissue, genomic data, sending samples overseas and Indigenous data sovereignty were discussed. Results: This paper illustrates a real-world example of how collaboration with community and the incorporation of Indigenous worldviews can be applied to molecular biology studies in a practical and culturally responsive manner, ensuring fair and equitable representation of Indigenous peoples in modern scientific data.

Indexed as

3D modelsethicsgenomicsIndigenouslive tissueMāorisnRNASeq

Identifiers

PMID39564513
PMCPMC11573560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.