Evidence mapPaperPMID 39566049Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions in Promoting Physical Activity Among College Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Siyuan Bi, Junfeng Yuan, Yanling Wang, Wenxin Zhang, Luqin Zhang, Yongjuan Zhang, Rui Zhu, Lin Luo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Enhancing Postsecondary Students' Dietary Behaviours: A Systematic Review of Mobile Health Interventions.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siyuan BiSchool of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0009-0002-5642-6775
Junfeng YuanSchool of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0009-0008-6744-725X
Yanling WangSchool of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0009-0000-0885-9440
Wenxin ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0009-0006-5738-0528
Luqin ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0009-0008-1432-5806
Yongjuan ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0009-0008-0381-1358
Rui ZhuSchool of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0060-6245
Lin LuoSchool of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1980-0342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies offer conflicting conclusions about the effectiveness of digital health interventions in changing physical activity behaviors. In addition, research focusing on digital health interventions for college students remains relatively scarce.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the impact of digital health interventions on physical activity behaviors among college students, using objective measures as outcome indicators.

methodsIn accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO (CINAHL Plus with full text), to identify relevant intervention studies published up to June 6, 2023. The inclusion criteria specified studies that examined the quantitative relationships between digital health interventions and physical activity among adults aged 18 years to 29 years, focusing on light physical activity (LPA), moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary time (ST), or steps. Non-randomized controlled trials were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results were synthesized both narratively and quantitatively, where applicable. When sufficient homogeneity was found among studies, a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis to account for variability.

resultsIn total, 8 studies, encompassing 569 participants, were included in the analysis. The primary outcomes measured were LPA, MVPA, ST, and steps. Among these studies, 3 reported on LPA, 5 on MVPA, 5 on ST, and 3 on steps. The meta-analysis revealed a significant increase in steps for the intervention group compared with the control group (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.64, 95% CI 0.37-0.92; P<.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the intervention and control groups regarding LPA (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.16; P=.51), MVPA (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.22; P=.88), and ST (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; P=.78).

conclusionsDigital health interventions are effective in increasing steps among college students; however, their effects on LPA, MVPA, and sedentary behavior are limited.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024533180; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=533180.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionStudentsAdolescentAdultDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleSedentary BehaviorUniversitiesYoung Adultcollege studentsdigital healthdigital health interventioneHealthknowledge synthesislight intensity physical activitymeta-analysismobile phonemoderate to vigorous physical activityphysical activityphysical activity behaviorsedentary behaviorstepssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39566049
PMCPMC11618011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.