Evidence mapPaperPMID 39567607Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

The effect of resistance training on patients with secondary sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fang Cheng, Na Li, Jinfeng Yang, Jinqi Yang, Weicheng Yang, Jianxin Ran, Peijie Sun, Yuanpeng Liao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Impact of muscle strength decline and exercise intervention on multimorbidity of chronic diseases in older adults.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fang ChengDepartment of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Na LiClinical Research Center for Geriatrics Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.
Jinfeng YangDepartment of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jinqi YangDepartment of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Weicheng YangDepartment of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jianxin RanDepartment of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Peijie SunDepartment of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yuanpeng LiaoDepartment of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, 610041, China. liaoyuanpeng@cdsu.edu.cn.

Funding

Key Laboratory of Sports Medicine of Sichuan Province, State Sports General Administration of China No. 2023-A021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyse the effectiveness of resistance training on secondary sarcopenia, we conducted a meta-analysis to elucidate the effects of resistance training (RT) on muscle strength (handgrip strength [HGS]), muscle mass (Skeletal muscle mass index [SMI]), and physical function (Gait speed [GS]) in patients with secondary sarcopenia. All studies published between 2015 and January 2024 on the effects of resistance training on patients with secondary sarcopenia were retrieved from 6 electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) Core journals and the Wanfang Database. Two researchers independently extracted and evaluated studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, 12 randomized controlled trials were included. Pooled analyses of baseline data and results were performed using Review Manager 5.3 with standardized mean variance (SMD) and random effects model. The study included 12 randomized controlled trials involving 639 patients (mean age 57.28 ± 2.66 to 79.6 ± 5.4 years). There are five types of complications among the patients: obesity, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, hemodiaysis, and pancreatic cancer. Compared with the control group, RT effectively improved HGS [SMD = 2.47, 95% CI (1.50, 3.43), p < 0.01, I

Indexed as

Hand StrengthResistance TrainingSarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicMuscle massMuscle strengthPhysical functionRTSecondary sarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID39567607
PMCPMC11579013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.