SynthesisScientific reports2024
A systematic review and meta-analysis of blood level of MCP-1/CCL-2 in severe and uncomplicated malaria.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of MIP-1α and MIP-1β Chemokines in Malaria in Relation to Disease Severity.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) or C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2 (CCL-2) is a key chemokine implicated in the inflammatory response to malaria. The objective of the study was to synthesize the evidence on variations in MCP-1/CCL-2 levels in relation to Plasmodium spp. infections and the severity of malaria. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024565867). To identify relevant studies, a comprehensive search strategy was conducted using major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, Journals@Ovid, and Nursing & Allied Health Premium. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists were used to determine the risk of bias in selected studies. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD, Hedge's g) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using the random-effects model. Thirty-three studies, with a total of 6,804 participants enrolled, were included in the systematic review. Most studies (60.6%) were published between 2010 and 2019; the majority (57.6%) were conducted in Africa. The predominant Plasmodium species studied was P. falciparum (66.7%). The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in MCP-1/CCL-2 levels between Plasmodium-infected and uninfected individuals (P: 0.16, SMD: 0.99, 95% CI: -0.39-2.37, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.