ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2024
Detection of diagnostic somatic copy number alterations from cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA in brain tumor patients.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Clinical Utility of Cell-Free DNA in Brain Tumor Management: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing of Intraoperatively Acquired Cerebrospinal Fluid and Matched Tumor Tissue in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Glioblastoma.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid-Derived Genomic Alterations Tracking Glioma.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsies for the monitoring of gliomas and brain metastases in adults.Acta neuropathologica · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gold standard for precise diagnostic classification of brain tumors requires tissue sampling, which carries relevant procedural risks. Brain biopsies often have limited sensitivity and fail to address tumor heterogeneity, because small tissue parts are being examined. This study aims to explore the detection and quantification of diagnostically relevant somatic copy number aberrations (SCNAs) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a real-world cohort of patients with defined brain tumor subtypes. A total of 33 CSF samples were collected from 30 patients for cfDNA extraction. Shallow whole-genome sequencing was conducted on CSF samples containing > 3ng of cfDNA and corresponding tissue DNA from nine patients. The sequencing cohort encompassed 26 samples of 23 patients, comprising 12 with confirmed CNS cancer as compared to 11 patients with either ambiguous CNS lesions (n = 5) or non-cancer CNS lesions (n = 6). After mapping and quality filtering SCNAs were called by depth-of-coverage analyses with a binning of 5.5 Mbp. SCNAs were exclusively identified in CSF cfDNA from brain tumor patients (10/12, 83%). In tumor patients, SCNAs were detectable in cfDNA from all patients with, but also in five of seven patients without tumor cells detected by CSF cytopathology. A substantial number of shared SCNAs were traceable between tissue and CSF in matched pair analyses. Additionally, some SCNAs unique to either CSF or tissue indicating spatial heterogeneity or tumor evolution. Also, diagnostically relevant genomic alterations as well as essential and desirable SCNAs as implemented in the current WHO classification of CNS tumors for certain primary brain tumor subtypes were traceable. In summary, this minimally invasive cfDNA-based LB approach employing shallow whole genome sequencing demonstrates potential for providing a molecularly informed diagnosis of CNS cancers, mapping tumor heterogeneity, tracking tumor evolution, and surveilling tumor patients. Further prospective trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.